Cabinet Office

 

This information is being maintained for archive/historical purposes. 
It will not be updated.
Please see http://archive.cabinet-office.gov.uk for details.
The Service First and Modernising Government programmes have now been completed. The information held on this site is no longer being maintained but is retained for archive purposes.

To learn about reform of public services, you may find the following sites useful:

Prime Minister’s Office of Public Service Reform 
Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit
Civil Service Reform 

Charter Mark Website



If you work in the public sector, you can access our good practice database and other useful information via the Public Sector Benchmarking Service.

Link back to homepage What's new Performance information Better Government for Older People
Introduction People's Panel How to complain
National charters Quality networks Best practice
Charter Mark Joined-up Public Services Index

 

Back to consumer focus home page

Modernising Government: A new consumer focus for public services

Guidance to Departments, Agencies and NDPBs

Contents

Introduction
Key proposals
The People's Panel
Service delivery agreements
Consumer champions
Timing and reporting
Sources of advice
Public services to be included in People's Panel research

Introduction

The Government announced on 9 February a joint Cabinet Office/HM Treasury initiative for a new consumer focus for public service (formerly know as the consumer test). The idea was contained in the Modernising Government White Paper and is a key new plank in making public services more responsive to consumers.

The Government’s aim is to encourage services to be more responsive to their users, with a focus on how consumer’s views are built into an organisation’s planning process and how the quality of service delivery is improved as a result. The consumer focus is not about carrying out a single test of user satisfaction, but about cultural change. It means gathering information where it will be most useful and have most effect.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Key Proposals

The key proposals for the consumer focus are:

The Cabinet Office will use the People’s Panel regularly to assess consumer satisfaction with key public services.

Departments and agencies responsible for delivering services to the public should put in place a programme to ensure that these services meet the needs of consumers. This includes:

designating an official at senior board level to take responsibility for the design and implementation of the programme: a ‘consumer champion’ (it may be sensible to appoint consumer champions at other levels too);

identifying user priorities and examining user satisfaction through regular research and consultation;

taking account of consumer views at every level in the organisation in the design and delivery of services and reporting on improvements made in annual reports;

and providing feedback to consumers;.

Targets will be set in Service Delivery Agreements during the 2000 Spending Review wherever possible and sensible.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

The People's Panel

We plan to use the People’s Panel to carry out regular consumer surveys across a range of key public services (see Annex A). The first step will be to use the Panel to set a baseline against which future surveys can be measured. This will cover a range of issues including:

frequency of use;

satisfaction;

expectations;

communication; and

how well complaints are handled (where historical Cabinet Office data can be built on).

There are many similarities between Best Value in local government and the consumer focus in central government. Work is considerably advanced in drawing up new Performance Indicators for local government under the Best Value regime. These include a mix of service specific indicators and ‘general health’ indicators, including consumer satisfaction. To aid comparison of results, questions used in the People’s Panel surveys will match as closely as possible those used to support Best Value PIs.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Sector Specific Surveys and Targets

Rather than impose a ‘one-size-fits all’ requirement, individual key public services dealing regularly with the public (both individual and business users) should work up their own consumer satisfaction systems to reflect individual circumstances. Our intention is to build on these systems and track performance over time. Initially it will be difficult to make direct comparisons between services given the different systems and methodologies in place. But we will be able to take into account the different elements that consumers think are important and to measure trends (including comparison with the results of the People’s Panel surveys). And over time we are aiming to increase comparability by moving towards a common set of questions and methodologies and encourage clusters of similar organisations to work together.

In implementing the consumer focus, key public services will need to:

put the right systems in place to measure effectively user satisfaction and meet consumer based targets;

look at ways of consulting consumers and targeting actions taken as a result of consumer feedback; and

ensure the process of feedback, including evaluating whether targets are being met, is transparent: the public will then be able to judge for themselves how well departments and agencies are improving service delivery.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Service Delivery Agreements

The 2000 Spending Review, and the new generation of Public Service Agreements and Service Delivery Agreements that emerge from it, will be used to set specific consumer satisfaction targets for departments and agencies based on their own customer/service priorities wherever possible and sensible.

The SDA itself should demonstrate that steps are being taken to improve consumer responsiveness, setting out a timetable for putting such a programme in place; or if it is in place already, outline its main components. This may need only cover services to the public. Some departments may have a number of different services and may need to cover each separately.

The following points should be borne in mind:

The information collected should help managers to identify areas of service where consumers are dissatisfied and identify what sort of improvements are needed.

Consumer views can usefully be taken using a variety of research or consultation methods. These include nationally representative surveys (face to face, telephone or postal); qualitative research (focus groups and depth interviews); point of contact feedback forms; consumer panels and mystery shopping. Many of these methods are simple and effective.

Complaints are a major source of information about what consumers think of the service they receive, where things are going wrong and the improvements they want. The information you get from complaints should be part of your approach for identifying consumer priorities and examining satisfaction.

Different methods of identifying consumer views will be appropriate in different circumstances. Often a range of methods, both research-based and consultative, can build up a stronger picture. For example, a national survey of consumer views is a good way of establishing broad customer priorities and the areas where service is perceived to need improvement. Qualitative research and local consultation can provide more detail on precisely where the service is going wrong and can also help in shaping solutions.

Different groups may have different needs and experience of services. Where possible, analysis should reflect this diversity; key variants will differ depending on the nature of the service, but for services to the public should include age, gender, ethnicity, disability and frequency of contact with the service. For business customers, it may be sensible to look at size, geographical spread, etc. Targeted consultation or qualitative research can be good ways of ensuring the particular needs of groups are not overlooked.

Departments and agencies should consider carrying out joint research where user groups are similar. This could help reduce research costs (and avoids bothering the same people twice!).

It might be an option to buy a suite of questions in an omnibus survey such as those run by ONS and market research companies; this is a relatively cheap and quick option, but clearly only works for groups who are widely represented in the national population.

As far as possible, the programme should be crystallised into SDA targets. Precise targets will depend on the nature of the business.

In describing existing programmes and setting targets, departments need to demonstrate that they are regularly identifying customer priorities and criticisms of service, consulting them and addressing criticisms. Models for targets might be:

A date for establishing and/or a commitment to obtain regularly information on consumer priorities for levels of service and identification of the key issues which come out of the research. Some organisations already set targets for the level of consumer satisfaction. Inland Revenue has an existing PSA target to improve its satisfaction points by 5% in an established index of customer service performance. This may be sensible, where the baseline is well established and movements in consumer opinion are not subject to volatility. But this is not likely to be appropriate in many cases, especially where rising standards of service may lead to rising expectations. Rather than focusing on levels of satisfaction, it may often be better to identify through research the specific areas which consumers wish to see improved and demonstrate that action is being taken in response;

demonstration that customers are regularly consulted at every level on existing services, or where changes are planned. This might be achieved, either by describing current arrangements or by setting a target to introduce a programme for doing so;

identification of areas where services have already been improved and mechanisms or programmes which have been put in place, for example the consumer champion, to improve services in future.

Where services are delivered through local authorities, departments may want to refer to the arrangements under Best Value. National research on consumer views, for example, on education, are likely to be of use.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Consumer Champions

The key aim of the consumer focus is to use consumers’ views to improve the quality of the service delivered. To ensure this is achieved, public services need to builds consumers’ views into their planning and appoint a consumer champion at board level so that those views are turned into positive action. The consumer champion should have specific responsibility for the design and implementation of this programme.

The consumer champion should be responsible for and have the necessary authority to:

devise a strategy for ensuring that consumers’ views (both users and potential users) are fed into the organisation’s business planning process;

be responsible for setting targets/indicators that measure the extent to which consumers’ views/needs are responded to;

ensuring consumers are consulted about an organisation’s services, and that the results are effectively acted upon within that organisation; and

reporting at least annually on how that organisation has responded to consumers’ views and needs.

But the role of the consumer champion is more than acting as the voice of the service user: he/she also needs to ensure that change has meaning, impact and is long-term. The consumer champion needs to work across the department/agency/organisation, so that users views are listened to, understood and acted upon. In order to meet the commitment in the Modernising Government White Paper that public services are to be delivered to meet the needs of the user and not the convenience of the provider, the role of the consumer champion should be to ensure that all management decisions are taken with the consumers views at the forefront.

The consumer champion should communicate findings from consumer research throughout the organisation in a way that is easily understandable by staff at all levels: if the findings are not easily understood, they will not be acted upon, or worse they will be misinterpreted. It is important that all staff understand what they individually can do to improve consumer service.

Service users need to be told what action took place following their investing time to provide feedback to the organisation or take part in a consumer satisfaction survey. The perception that no action took place is often seen as worse than if users’ views had not been sought in the first place. Furthermore, research has shown that the better a service is at keeping people informed, the higher its satisfaction rating.

The consumer champions need to be innovative in their approach to problem solving. This is essential when interpreting consumer satisfaction data and developing creative solutions as well as quick wins. The consumer champion also needs to be able to motivate different parts of the organisation to deliver against these solutions.

The consumer champion needs to maximise the value of consumer satisfaction data. In doing this, he/she should identify what is most important to users and ensure that corrective action is developed that will actually deliver what the consumer needs.

Last, and by no means least, the consumer champion needs to be able to drive the necessary changes through the organisation. He/she should generally be at Executive Board level within an organisation. It may make sense in large organisations to appoint consumer champions at other levels too.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Timing and Reporting

An indicative outline timetable for the consumer focus is as follows:

9 February: Ministerial announcement.

30 March: New SDAs to be submitted to HM Treasury.

19 April: First meeting of Consumer Champions

Late Spring: Initial report, including baseline results from the People’s Panel survey and a summary of how public services are introducing the consumer focus.

July: Consumer focus targets agreed for SDAs

Autumn : Full first year report, SDAs published

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Sources of Advice

Many departments and some agencies have professionals with expertise in survey and opinion research, and they should be consulted in the first instance. There are also other sources of advice inside and outside Government.

Where no in-house expertise exists, it may be necessary to get expert advice from consultancies, universities, research institutes or individuals specialised in social research or consider contracting out the research if necessary. But care needs to be taken when consulting organisations which are, or represent, potential contenders for conducting your research, and so have a vested interest.

Advice inside Government is available from:

Social Survey Division of the Office for National Statistics, which both conducts social surveys and provides advice and consultancy on surveys carried out for Government departments, either on particular aspects such as question wording or generally. Contact Joy Dobbs, Divisional Director, on 020 7533 5369 (GTN 3042 5369), or Jean Martin, Director of Survey Methodology, on 020 7533 5314 (GTN 3042 5314); and

the Central Office of Information’s Research Division, part of the Marketing Communications group, which provides a specialist procurement and management service for opinion, marketing and communication research. Contact Debbie Whitehead, Director of research, by e-mail at dwhitehe@coi.gov.uk or on 020 7271 8425, fax 020 7401 2808.

Advice outside Government is available from:

The Market Research Society, tel. 020 7490 4911

The Social Research Association, tel.: 020 8997 5437

The Association of Users of Research Agencies (contact via Debbie Whitehead – see above)

Social Statistics and Survey Methodology section of the
Royal Statistical Society

The Association of Qualitative Research Practitioners, tel.: 01480 407227.

We have published a good practice guide ‘How to consult your
users
’. This gives tips about consultations, introduces some of the commonly-used ways of consulting users, sets out some of the issues to think about when considering each method, and summarises the pros and cons of different types of consultation. Copies of the guide can be obtained free of charge from the Service First publications line, tel: 0845 7 22 32 42

You might also find useful tips on our best practice database
(www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/servicefirst/index/guidhome.htm)

The Cabinet Office is also producing separate guidance to policy makers in UK Government departments and agencies who are considering whether to commission research seeking the views and opinions of members of the public.

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

Modernising Public Services Group
Cabinet Office
11 February 2000

Annex A

Public services to be included in People's Panel research

 

Benefits Agency

Employment Service

Child Support Agency

Passport Agency

GPs

NHS Hospitals

Ambulance service

Fire service

Police

Inland Revenue

The Courts

Local councils

Local sports/leisure facilities

Libraries

Parks and open spaces

Provision of recycling facilities

Refuse/waste collection service

Road maintenance and repairs

Pavement maintenance

Street lighting

Street cleaning

Local Nursery schools/classes

Local Primary schools

Local Secondary schools

Local Adult Education

Youth clubs and other facilities for young people

Council housing service

Local Bus services

Train companies

Museums and art galleries

 

Back to top of pageuparrow1.gif (953 bytes)

  Last updated: February 2000