Quality Schemes Task Force Report
Summary
1. During the year, the Task Force:
 | surveyed literature on quality scheme content, |
 | consulted widely on the need for guidance on use of quality schemes and other issues, |
 | wrote guidance on Best Value and quality schemes, |
 | embarked on comprehensive guidance on schemes and |
 | agreed a 10-point action plan for the future. |
Report
2. This is the report of the Quality Schemes Task Force. The Task Force was launched by
Peter Kilfoyle, then Cabinet Office Parliamentary Secretary, on 21 January 1999. This
was a contribution to improving the quality of public services; and the work of the Task
Force is integrated into the quality pledge in the Modernising Government
White Paper of March 1999.
3. The terms of reference of the Task Force were:
 | to explore the inter-relationship between quality schemes operating in the public
sector; |
 | to examine the scope for improved guidance to services; |
 | to identify and promote best practice; and |
 | to consider the possibilities for closer working together with a view to enhancing the
impact of the different schemes, and as a contribution to improving the quality of
services. |
4. The group was tasked with producing a final report at the end of 1999.
5. Membership of the Task Force was (full year or part):
 | Association of British Certification Bodies |
 | British Quality Foundation |
 | British Standards Institution |
 | Cabinet Office |
 | Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions |
 | Department of Trade and Industry |
 | Investors in People UK |
 | Quality Scotland |
 | United Kingdom Accreditation Service |
6. The representation brought to the Task Force knowledge of the following generic
quality schemes:
 | Charter Mark |
 | EFQM Excellence Model |
 | Investors in People |
 | ISO 9000 |
7. The Cabinet Office had already issued a short descriptive booklet about these
schemes, showing how the holistic nature of the EFQM Excellence Model fitted well with
Charter Mark, Investors in People and ISO 9000. Annex A
details main Cabinet Office quality scheme initiatives.
8. The Task Force met seven times during the year - on 21 January, 11 March, 29 April,
30 June, 16 September, 21 October and 7 December 1999.
9. The Task Force created a Communications Group of 57 quality scheme users and
other practitioners. Group Members were consulted on all Task Force papers and received
minutes of meetings.
10. The Task Force looked at available work on content of these schemes. Much detailed
material was found on links between the various generic schemes. However, the Task Force
did not consider this material to be sufficiently effective in encouraging the increased
use of quality schemes in the public sector.
Consultation
11. The Task Force therefore consulted widely in the public sector to discover whether
there was a demand for further guidance. A questionnaire was distributed (with help from
The Improvement and Development Agency, the Northern Ireland Office and the Council of
Scottish Local Authorities) which asked questions on:
 | Management of quality in the organisation; |
 | Quality in relation to services delivery; |
 | Experience of different quality schemes; and |
 | What further help was needed. |
12. The questionnaire asked respondents if they had considered using any of the quality
schemes to develop their service. In their replies:
 | 85% mentioned Investors in People; |
 | 72 % mentioned the EFQM Excellence Model; |
 | 65% mentioned Charter Mark; and |
 | 53% mentioned ISO 9000. |
13. 700 questionnaires were distributed. 549 responses were received. These showed
clear demand for guidance - which should describe quality schemes and their objectives,
set out relationships between the schemes and other quality initiatives, indicate the
resource implications for users and provide examples and case studies.
The Guidance
14. The responses also provided a wealth of data on use of and attitudes towards
quality schemes, which informed the Task Force's action plan. An executive summary of the
report will shortly be available from this website. The full report, costing £25 can be
obtained from Martin
Holt, tel: 020 7276 1743.
15. The Cabinet Office held focus group meetings with quality scheme users who were
also adamant that guidance was needed and who provided valuable advice on what its format
should be and on other quality scheme issues.
16. The Task Force concluded that it should issue comprehensive guidance in spring
2000. It is envisaged that hard copies will be charged for; and that it will also be
available on the Internet.
17. The Task Force also decided that guidance for local government on Best Value and
quality schemes would be timely and of help to enhance public services. The Department of
the Environment Transport and the Regions and the Improvement and Development Agency
agreed to issue this jointly with the Cabinet Office. This guidance will issue in January
2000 and will help local authorities understand how quality schemes can assist with the
successful implementation of Best Value.
Assessment
18. The Task Force also considered co-operation between quality schemes on assessment.
It was noted that there was a third party assessment aspect to Charter Mark, Investors in
People and (usually) the ISO 9000 series. In principle overlaps between the schemes could
be subject to joint assessment. Nevertheless the degree of overlap between Charter Mark
and Investors in People and Charter Mark and ISO 9000 was relatively small. The degree of
overlap between Investors in People and ISO 9000 was greater. Experimentation on joint
assessment between these two schemes was under way.
19. The Task Force also noted that the EFQM Excellence Model usually operated through
self-assessment; although there was training in assessment and there were consultancies
that offered third party assessment. Third party assessment was required for award
applicants. In principle there was scope for appropriately trained/approved assessors to
offer assistance with the EFQM Excellence Model and any one or more of Charter Mark,
Investors in People and ISO 9000. In doing so there might be scope for avoidance of double
assessment vis à vis those schemes and/or better informed assessment.
20. The Task Force agreed to encourage the work on joint assessment of Investors in
People and ISO 9000. It also agreed that further work was needed on co-operation on
assessment between all the schemes.
10-Point Action Plan
21. The Task Force suggested a 10-point action plan:
 | Launch and promote the new guidance on how quality schemes can help deliver Best Value:
by January 2000.
|
 | Production of general guidance on quality schemes (including a marketing plan): by March
2000.
|
 | A new plan for co-ordinated marketing of quality schemes, building on existing links
with quality schemes and including:
|
 | sector targeting;
|
 | more effective use of web sites;
|
 | use of conferences and other events;
|
 | consideration of promoting a users forum or separate fora covering the main
sectors, eg local government, health and education; and
|
 | raising senior management awareness: by July 2000.
|
 | Implementation in the Cabinet Office of integrated promotion of and advice on use of
generic quality schemes with effective links to other Government Departments.
(Substantial demand for a single source of guidance in central government emerged from the
Task Force survey): by July 2000.
|
 | Proposals for research on and evaluation of the contribution of quality schemes to
public sector service delivery, when the Cabinet Office evaluation of the EFQM Excellence
Model should be complete: July 2000.
|
 | Further co-operation on assessment between quality schemes: by October 2000.
|
 | A new framework for further identification and promotion of best practice stemming from
the use of quality schemes (eg in consultation of customers), including dissemination
through existing networks. (The Cabinet Office is already working on a Beacon Scheme for
Central Government based on Charter Mark and the Excellence Model. Cabinet Office has
introduced and is further developing a best practice website): by October 2000.
|
 | Promotion of training within the public sector on application of quality schemes and the
assessment processes (- the need for training was a prominent message from the
Task Force survey): by December 2000.
|
 | An action plan for mainstreaming best practice learned from quality schemes
and use of quality schemes: December 2000.
|
 | Evaluation in 2001 of the Task Forces work and guidance: December 2000. |
Follow-on
22. The Task Force recommended that follow-up work would be best promoted through a
Steering Group reporting to Ministers and meeting twice year. The Task Force recognised
that Devolved Administrations would need to consider how these proposals would effect
their own areas and decide how best to follow them up. The Steering Group would be chaired
by the Cabinet Office and have:
 | top-level representatives from the four main quality schemes, |
 | representation from key areas of government, and |
 | practitioner representatives. |
Two working Groups would report to the Steering Group, with support from the Cabinet
Office: one to promote co-ordinated marketing and the other to take forward the other Task
Force recommendations.
23. The Task Force invited Cabinet Office Ministers to write to colleagues and other
key contacts about work of the Task Force and its proposed action plan.
Quality Schemes Task Force - December 1999
Cabinet Office Initiatives
Charter Mark
The Charter Mark and Beacons Scheme in the Cabinet Office runs the Charter Mark
Awards Scheme. For more details see the Charter
Mark web pages or contact:
Charter Mark Awards
Cabinet Office
Admiralty Arch
The Mall
London, SW1A 2WH
Tel 020 7276 1755 - for general enquiries only
Tel 0845 30 40 430 - for the application helpline
Tel 0845 7 22 32 42 - for copies of Charter Mark documents, Self-Assessment packs, and
guides
Tel 020 7403 3023 for seminars and workshops
Investors in People
Information on introducing and working with the Standard in the public sector is
available from:
Peter Jones
Learning Strategy Division
Cabinet Office
Admiralty Arch
The Mall
London SW1A 2WH
Tel: 020 7 276 1599
UK Public Sector Benchmarking Project
The UK Public Sector Benchmarking Project aims to help organisations in the public
sector to improve their performance by conducting self-assessments against the Excellence
Model. For more details see the Public
Sector Benchmarking Service web pages,
or contact:
Barbara Topping
Tel: 020 7865 4949,
email: barbara.topping@hmce.gov.uk |