Cabinet Office

 

This information is being maintained for archive/historical purposes. 
It will not be updated.
Please see http://archive.cabinet-office.gov.uk for details.
The Service First and Modernising Government programmes have now been completed. The information held on this site is no longer being maintained but is retained for archive purposes.

To learn about reform of public services, you may find the following sites useful:

Prime Minister’s Office of Public Service Reform 
Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit
Civil Service Reform 

Charter Mark Website



If you work in the public sector, you can access our good practice database and other useful information via the Public Sector Benchmarking Service.

Link back to homepage What's new Performance information Better Government for Older People
Introduction People's Panel How to complain
National charters Quality networks Best practice
Charter Mark Joined-up Public Services Index

 


Chapter 3

spacer.gif (56 bytes)

Consult and Involve

'Consult and involve present and potential users of public services as well as those who work in them; and use their views to improve the service provided.'

Community Involvement

Community involvement is essential for ascertaining the needs of the community and for assisting decision making. The key to good consultation is to seek a spread of views from those likely to be affected. Users, businesses, staff and the wider community should all be involved to find out how services can be improved.

Planned Consultation

Regular, planned consultation and involvement through a range of methods such as questionnaires, meetings and focus groups are necessary to ensure that the results are sound. This means consulting users, and potential users, from different areas including businesses and from different social and ethnic backgrounds which, in turn, may involve making special arrangements to provide interpreters or to make consultation documents available in ethnic community languages, Braille and large print.

Staff Involvement

Staff, especially those on the front line making inspections, receiving telephone calls or meeting customers at reception, should be involved in service improvement initiatives. Quality circles, team meetings, ideas, competitions and staff suggestion boxes all provide opportunities for consulting and involving colleagues in planning, agreeing targets and providing continuous service improvements.

Response to Consultation

Having actively encouraged people to make comments it is important to ensure they are recorded and acted upon where appropriate. People should be told how their views have made a difference or, in some cases, why things cannot be changed, for instance, owing to financial or other constraints.

Examples of Good Practice

Customer satisfaction card for service usersat the end of each case.
Quality circles to involve staff in identifying service improvements.
Community group meetings with local residents.
Breakfast meetings with the business community.
Landlords' forum consultation used as basis for formulating discretionary grant policy.
Enforcement policy drawn up following consultation with Chamber of Commerce and Council for Racial Equality.
Expansion of a service (e.g. Business Advice Unit established) following feedback from users.
Annual Local Agenda 21 Conference.
Annual survey of households conducted by independent consultants.
Focus groups run by experienced moderators.
Telephone surveys of present and potential service users.

 

CASE STUDY 5 : Consult and Involve

(Source : North Kesteven District Council)

Introduction

The Council has used Citizens' Juries to consider ways in which services can be developed. In July 1996 a Citizens' Jury was convened to consider what facilities and services should be provided (a) locally (b) within reasonable travelling distance and (c) further away.

The Jury identified five major issues including the need for improved information links.

Service Development

In response to service users' requests for improved information links the Council introduced its Open District Electronic Network (ODEN).

ODEN is intended to provide Internet e-mail, file transfer, public and private forums, and access to databases of local information. Its objectives are to raise awareness of on-line systems and their use for communications and networking; provide a platform for individuals and organisations to establish a presence on the Internet; stimulate trading between local businesses; support exchange of information; inform the public of the Council's services, local events and places to visit.

Most Council staff and Members are now on-line, as are Parish Councils and many local businesses. The technology is in place, communications lines have been installed and local call rates are available across the District. ODEN costs £20 per year for subscription. ODEN can be accessed via an individual's PC or at one of the Council's INFO-LINK centres throughout the District.

Benefits

ODEN has helped to raise awareness of on-line systems and their use in communications and networking. It has vastly improved the exchange of information between the District and Parish Councils, local businesses and trade organisations. The system has also transformed the Council's internal operations, again improving communication between officers and Members.

Feedback

The system to date has proved to be very popular with all stakeholders and should continue to develop as more individuals/organisations come on-line.

Comments

Through the ODEN system the public have access to information on Council services, details of individual departments' functions and resumés of the roles of individual staff.

 

CASE STUDY 6 : Enforcement Policy Publication

(Source : London Borough of Bexley)

Introduction

In 1996 the Environmental Health & Trading Standards Department produced an enforcement policy covering all areas of its activity.

Service Development

The policy was formally adopted by the Council in September 1996 following consultation with:

Local businesses.
Bexley Council for Racial Equality.
Bexley Magistrates' Court.
Local Chambers of Commerce.
Councillors.
Staff.
Random selection of registered voters.

The simple, easy-to-read policy has been printed as a bi-fold A5 leaflet. This leaflet is available at Council offices and information points and is available for officers to distribute. The availability of the leaflet has also been highlighted in the local press.

Benefits

The leaflet has been useful for explaining to those subject to enforcement action why this was happening. It has also made clear to others the consequences if they failed to act. It makes it clear that enforcement action is a considered response and is not based on arbitrary decisions.

Feedback

A number of businesses subject to enforcement have specifically asked for copies of the Council's Enforcement Policy. To date however there has been no further specific feedback and it is assumed that this is because staff at Bexley have been following the policy closely.

Comments

Although the Department is responsible for enforcing a wide variety of legislation the general policy that has been followed appears to satisfy all eventualities - so far!

 

CASE STUDY 7 : Clean-Up for Selly Oak Consultation

(Source : Birmingham City Council)

Introduction

Clean-Up for Selly Oak was a large-scale community-based project of nearly 3,000 homes involving local residents, landlords, Residents' Associations and elected Members. The aim of the project was to improve the environmental quality of their area by tackling rat infestation and rubbish accumulation.

Service Development

Consultation involved sending letters to every home within the project area, in community languages, explaining the aims of the project. Officers visited every home soon afterwards. Visits were made outside normal working hours including weekends when people were often at home, to reduce the need for re-visits.

Pest control, refuse collection services and statutory action were co-ordinated and targeted over a short time period.

Benefits

By visits to every home all local residents were involved, many of whom may not have been involved if the usual range of consultation forums had been used. It was felt that face-to-face contact helped residents overcome any difficulties they may have had in participating and expressing their views, and led to more effective consultation.

Feedback

The raising of awareness, levels of statutory action taken and value for money were monitored and reported back to stakeholders. The monitoring provided a benchmark against which to measure future action.

Comment

A key element of the project was in listening to and involving the local community. This enabled a realistic plan of action to be devised. The partnerships developed are being used to discuss ways of tackling other local issues such as street litter and fly posting.

Next Chapter | Contents page

Last updated: June 1999