|
Previous chapter | Next chapter | Contents page |
|
Chapter 4
Charter standards
|
| |
|
Standards should be:
 | Relevant - they should clearly relate to the
needs of users, and should focus on key issues of interest to them.
|
 | Meaningful - they should look at the service
from the user's viewpoint; avoid management targets.
|
 | Challenging - they should be challenging but
realistic.
|
 | Simple - written in plain language.
|
 | Measurable - they should be measurable either
directly as part of normal procedures, or by a customer survey.
|
 | Monitored - systems should be in place to
support regular monitoring.
|
 | Published - performance against standards should
be widely published, following, wherever possible, independent validation.
|
 | Reviewed - their effectiveness should be
regularly reviewed, and standards updated. |
|
|
What are charter standards?
4.1
Charter standards set out clearly the service that users can expect to receive. Good
standards are vital for an effective charter, and should be expressed in a way that is
meaningful to all users. They usually focus on different issues from the strategic
performance targets set by ministers for their departments and agencies.
Relationship with the Whitehall standards
4.2
The six Whitehall standards - covering correspondence handling, keeping appointments, the
provision of information and telephone enquiry points, consultation with users, complaints
handling, and accessibility - set out the minimum service that central government
departments and executive agencies should apply in their dealings with the public. Your
charter standards should build on these. Guidance on the application of the Whitehall
standards can be obtained from the Cabinet Office on 020 7276 1764.
How should they be developed?
4.3
The standards you adopt should be based on the views of your users and potential users.
Find out what is important to them. Others (especially front-line staff) should also be
involved to tap their ideas for increasing the efficiency and quality of services.
Complaints and comments will help you identify those issues that users think are important
and any weaknesses, but you should also consult users direct. Senior managers should also
be involved to ensure and show top-level commitment to the process.
What should they cover?
4.4
Your standards should cover the main services you provide. They should focus as much on
the quality of the service, and the overall experience for the user as on the more easily
assessable measures of activity and process.
4.5
Standards should relate to: the service provided (for example issuing correctly documented
passports, or payment of the correct rate of benefit on the due date); the way in which
you deliver the service (for example the speed with which you answer letters or phone
calls); and the quality of service provided.
|
'We will reply to all your correspondence within a
maximum of 15 working days or acknowledge within 5 working days if the matter is complex.
We will make every effort to resolve your enquiry in full before a reply is sent. If this
is not possible, the reply will detail current progress and tell you when to expect a full
answer. Letters will tell you the name and phone number of the person replying. We will
use plain language and send any requests for additional information promptly and
accompanied by an addressed reply label.' (UK Passport Agency)
|
|
Quality
4.6
The quality of your service is critical. For example, a quick reply is no use if the
information in it is wrong. The development of good quality measures is difficult, and
individual circumstances vary. Start by establishing clearly what your organisation is
there to achieve and the main services you provide. And consider what the benefit is to
your users and how this might be measured.
Coverage of users
4.7
Charter standards should, wherever possible, address all users. Try not to write your
standards in such a way that they address only some (even if the majority) of your users
(for example 80% or eight out of ten). For example, a management-style target that 80% of
cases should be cleared within two weeks of receipt leaves individual users wondering
whether they will be part of the unlucky 20%. Depending on the nature of your operation
you might try the following:
 | many executive agencies have performance indicators that
are expressed in quantifiable terms (for example 90% of claims processed within 5 days).
You might, therefore, consider setting a charter standard for all claims to be processed
within 10 days, although the vast majority will be done within 5: this might then need to
be reflected back into your formal performance indicators; |
 | if the nature of your operation is such that you cannot
guarantee to process all claims etc within a reasonable time-frame, say what you can do
(for example 9 out of 10 in certain straightforward categories within 10 days) and what
you will do for others (for example that you will contact anyone whose claim will not be
cleared by then to explain the problem and tell them how long it will take). Or you might
say that you will process 8 out of 10 applications within 'x' days, and that all the
remainder will be processed within 'y' days. Again you should tell people as soon as
possible which category they fall into; |
 | if there are important areas where your service needs to
be improved, consider developing a target that highlights the failure rate. For example,
if one of your standards is that you will process 90% of claims within 10 days (as above),
this could be supported by a standard on the following lines - 'currently we fail to
process [how many] claims within 10 days. We will reduce this by [%] by [target date]. '
Experience has shown that publication of information in this way can be a major force for
improvement. |
4.8
Research shows that many people do not understand percentages. So wherever possible you
should avoid their use. For example, say '9 out of 10' people in place of 90%. If your
target cannot be directly converted from a percentage (for example 83% or 97%, you might
round up or down to the nearest whole number (for example 8 out of 10 or 97 out of 100).
Alternatively, you could give the percentage and include a short explanation.
Coverage of services
4.9
Your standards should cover the key aspects of the services you provide. You should
therefore include, for example, standards on waiting times, in-service time of automated
service machines (and time taken to repair them should they go wrong and the procedures
for telling people how long it will be before they can use them again), and the supply of
personalised information to users (for example parents or patients).
|
'We will make every effort to deliver your driving
licence to you within 3 weeks of receiving the application, except in those cases which
require medical investigation - which often requires us to contact your doctor - in which
case we will complete our work within 5 weeks for car/ motorbike licences or seven for HGV
or PSVs. ' (DVLA)
'We aim to keep our stamp vending machines in service
for at least 98% of the time. If they go wrong we aim to get them working again within 8
hours. ' (Post Office Counters Ltd)
|
|
What are you promising?
4.10
You need to think carefully about the wording of your charter. It should make clear
whether your users have a right to each standard that is enforceable through the
courts or other means (for example a complaints procedure or independent review), or
whether you simply aim to meet them as targets.
Enforceable right - a charter standard that
applies to all users all of the time they use the service. It must be clear when the
standard has not been met, and a remedy must be available. Either the provider must
immediately put things right, or it must be possible for the user to enforce a remedy
through a dispute resolution process (for example the courts, regulator, an ombudsman, or
appeal panel).
|
'If your landlord does not do an urgent repair costing up
to £250 promptly, you are entitled to have it done by an alternative contractor approved
by your landlord. When the work is done, the contractor will send the bill direct to your
landlord. Your landlord must make clear how quickly he expects to do a repair covered by
the scheme. ' (The Tenant's Charter for Scotland)
|
|
Target - a level of service which the provider is aiming to provide, but
which the user cannot always expect to receive, and for which a remedy is not necessarily
available. A target that is likely to be unattainable more than 25% of the time should be
changed.
4.11
Whether your standards are rights or targets, you should make clear what happens if they
are not met.
4.12
You might tell users that some standards may not be met if they fail to provide full and
accurate information. But you need to be sure that your forms and instructions are clear
and easily understood. Research shows that poorly designed forms and complicated
procedures lead to mistakes.
Challenging
4.13
Your standards should be challenging, but realistic. You should draw them up, where
appropriate, by comparing them with those developed by comparable organisations in the UK,
and where relevant, overseas. You will need to be careful when developing your standards
to avoid unintended results, for example to focus staff on easy cases at the expense of
difficult ones. You should also be honest about what can be provided. Raising expectations
unrealistically leads to frustration, which may in turn provoke rudeness or worse.
Keep them simple
4.14
Your standards should be easy to understand and written in plain language.
|
'To make sure road signs are cleaned and maintained so
that they are clear and visible at all times. ' (Highways Agency)
'We will clean the common areas in multi-storey flats
at least once every week. ' (Northern Ireland Housing Executive - Tenant's Charter)
|
|
Measurable
4.15
Your standards should be measurable. There is no point telling people that they will be
seen 'quickly' unless you tell people what this means and then monitor your performance.
|
'We will repair lifts that have broken down within 24
hours and door entry systems within 4 days. ' (Northern Ireland Housing Executive -
Tenant's Charter)
|
|
Monitoring
4.16
You should develop procedures to monitor your organisation's performance against its
standards. This could be done either as part of your normal operating procedures (for
example time taken to process claims and error rates) or by surveys of users, or mystery
shopping (for example sampling how your service is actually being delivered). Whichever
method you adopt, the results are critical to shape your own performance review, as well
as to inform your users of how you are performing. You may need to train your staff to do
this, and to appoint someone to pull the information together. Complaints too should be
managed in a positive way and used to inform service changes. Information from complaints
analysis should be fed back to staff and users.
Independent validation
4.17
To demonstrate the effectiveness of your service in an open and verifiable way, you
should, wherever possible, arrange for an external organisation to validate your
performance independently against your charter standards. This task could be undertaken by
a statutory body or a commercial auditor. You will need to consider the cost of such a
move against the benefits to be gained. The outcome will vary between organisations.
Publishing information on performance
4.18
Your users have a right to know how you are performing against your standards. The results
of your monitoring should be published in such a way that it gets to as many of your users
as possible, and is easily understood by them. You will need to think about how you do
this. Much will depend on the nature of your organisation and its users. You could
consider some of the suggestions for distributing new or revised charters in the chapter
on publicity and distribution (Chapter 8).
Review
4.19
You should arrange for the results of your monitoring to be regularly reviewed by senior
staff and action to be put in hand if standards are not met. Consider whether your
standards need to be updated in order to remain relevant and challenging.
|
Previous chapter | Next chapter | Contents page |
|