Cabinet Office

 

This information is being maintained for archive/historical purposes. 
It will not be updated.
Please see http://archive.cabinet-office.gov.uk for details.
The Service First and Modernising Government programmes have now been completed. The information held on this site is no longer being maintained but is retained for archive purposes.

To learn about reform of public services, you may find the following sites useful:

Prime Minister’s Office of Public Service Reform 
Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit
Civil Service Reform 

Charter Mark Website



If you work in the public sector, you can access our good practice database and other useful information via the Public Sector Benchmarking Service.

Link back to homepage What's new Performance information Better Government for Older People
Introduction People's Panel How to complain
National charters Quality networks Best practice
Charter Mark Joined-up Public Services Index

 

Next chapter | Contents page

Chapter 17

Ballots/referenda/deliberative polling

Spacer

17.1 With a few high profile exceptions, national referenda are rare in this country, but they have been used at local levels. People are asked to vote either for or against an option or a limited number of options.

17.2 In deliberative polling, a representative sample of people is initially polled on an issue. They then learn more about the topic through being given information, asking questions and participating in discussions, and at the end of the process are polled again.

Points to think about:

 

Usage: referenda and ballots will only be suitable for some issues. You will only get a 'yes/no' answer, so if you are looking for qualitative comments this is not the right technique. Issues should be those that will be of significant interest to your users, and the question/s need to be phrased in a way that allows people to make a clear choice between the options. If the issue does not lend itself to a 'yes/no' answer, then avoid this approach.

 

Context: deliberative polling recognises that people make different choices when they have different amounts of information. Any sort of polling should not be carried out in a vacuum people should have the opportunity to debate the issues, hear from supporters of all the different options, and make a considered choice.

 

Methods: a variety of different methods can be used postal ballots and personal voting are the most common at the moment, but information technology is opening up new possibilities. Electronic systems to allow groups of people to vote for particular options are already used, and telephone and Internet voting from the home are often seen on the television. Increasing opportunities for people to use these methods are likely to improve participation levels, but there are issues surrounding confidentiality and prevention of misuse that may be significant as these areas develop.

Pros

 

Easy to interpret results.
Increasingly easy for people to participate.

Cons

 

No qualitative information.
Results can be based on superficial uninformed responses but there's no way for you to find this out.
Results can be swayed by the amount and quality of information provided by supporters of each option, rather than by the issue itself.
Often gets low turnouts.
Deliberative polling techniques can be very expensive.

Costs: expensive, particularly for deliberative polling.

Use to: get clear mandate (depending on response) for particular action.

You will only get a yes/no answer, so if you are looking for qualitative comments this is not the right technique.

 

Next chapter | Contents page